Cherylynn Costner v. MRA Funding Corporation et al
| Cherylynn Costner |
| MRA Funding Corporation, S.B.S. Trust Deed Network, Empire Mortgage X, Inc. and Does |
| 2:2009cv00649 |
| January 28, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Eick |
| Gutierrez |
| Banks and Banking |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Fair Housing Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS Order Dismissing Case held before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: On January 30, 2009, Cherylynn Costner ("Plaintiff") filed the instant action against MRA Funding Corporation ("MRA"), S.B.S. Trust Deed Network ( "S.B.S."), and Empire Mortgage X, Inc. ("Empire") (collectively, "Defendants"). To date, Plaintiff has yet to serve Defendants. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 provides: "If a defendant is not served within 120 da ys after the complaint is filed, the court on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). It has now been almost 180 days since Plaintiff filed her complaint. However, she still has not served Defendants. Accordingly, the Court hereby DISMISSES this action, without prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm)
|
|
Filing
9
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez Denying Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order 8 : On January 30, 2009, Cherylynn Costner ("Plaintiff"), appearing pro se, filed an ex parte application for a temporary restraining order ("TRO") with the Court. In her application, Plaintiff requests a temporary restraining order, enjoining Empire Mortgage X, Inc. ("Defendant") and its agents, servants, and employees from transferring title of ownership of an automobile that Plaintiff allegedly owns. For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's application. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
