Steve Adachi et al v. Carlyle/Galaxy San Pedro, L.P. et al
| Sharlyne Braude, Parag Gupta, Steve Adachi, Jeremy Carson, Erika Gardea, Michael Gardea, Glenn Henderson, Mary Henderson, Steve Henderson, Victoire Hovland, Douglas Kim, Imaan Mohammadpour, Riye Park, Eileen Peviani, Ted Sumida, Jessica Vanderlan, Yogendra Kumar and Greg Perrault |
| Mara Escrow Company, Carlyle/Galaxy San Pedro, L.P., Carlyle San Pedro GP, L.L.C., Galaxy San Pedro, L.L.C., Carlyle San Pedro, L.L.C., Carlyle Realty Partners IV, L.P., Galaxy Commercial Holding, L.L.C. and Raffi Cohen |
| 2:2009cv00793 |
| February 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| XX US, Outside California |
| Morrow |
| Wistrich |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 0001 Antitrust Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
123
JUDGMENT by Judge Margaret M. Morrow, in favor of Riye Park, Ted Sumida against Carlyle Realty Partners IV, L.P., Carlyle San Pedro GP, L.L.C., Carlyle San Pedro, L.L.C., Carlyle/Galaxy San Pedro, L.P., Galaxy Commercial Holding, L.L.C., Galaxy San P edro, L.L.C., Raffi Cohen. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. That the court certifies a settlement class comprised of all individuals and entities who are (a) a purchaser (or co-purchaser) who entered into a Purchase Agreement to purchase a Unit at the Property between April 1, 2006 and March 31, 2009; and (b) a party to an Escrow that remains open as of May 1, 2009 with regard to the purchase of a Unit at the Property for a Purchase Agreement signed between April 1, 2006 and March 31, 2009;2. That the settlement administrator shall within 14 days of the date of this order distribute to class members 27.25% of the amount deposited by them in escrow for the purchase of a unit at the Vue, after deducting any remaining escrow fees owed to th e escrow holder 50% from the amount to be distributed to the class members and 50% from defendants share of the amount still held in escrow; 3. That any settlement administration costs shall be paid in equal shares by the class and defendan ts; 4. That class counsel shall be paid $282,766.30 in reasonable attorneys fees; 5. That the named plaintiffs shall each receive an incentive payment of $2,000; 6. That plaintiffs claims be, and they hereby are, dismissed with prejudice on the terms and conditions set forth in the parties settlement agreement, and that all plaintiffs who elected to participate in this action release all claims against defendants as set forth in the settlement agreement; and 7. That this action be, and it hereby is, dismissed. The court retains jurisdiction for the purposes of supervising implementation of the parties settlement. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rrey)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 1/6/09. The court, on its own motion, hereby strikes Docket No. 32 from the Court Docket. In order to allow Plaintiffs an adequate opportunity to file responses to Defendants (1) Motion to Compel Arbitration . The court, on its own motion, continues the hearing date to 1/23/09 at 2:00 p.m. Plaintiffs shall file and serve their oppositions to these motion by 1/14/09 and Defendants shall file and serve their reply briefs by 1/19/09.The court also calendars oral argument on Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application for a Protective Order for the same time. Defendants may file a response to the ex parte application by 1/9/09 and Plaintiff a reply brief by 1/16/09.(tkl)[Transferred from California Southern on 2/3/2009.]
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER denying Plaintiffs' 18 Ex Parte Motion to Continue the Hearing Date on Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 1/5/2009. (jah) Modified on 1/6/2009 (jah).[Transferred from California Southern on 2/3/2009.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
