AT & T Mobility LLC et al v. S & D Cellular, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: AT & t Intellectual Property II, L.P. and AT & T Mobility LLC
Defendant: S & D Cellular, Inc., Dilip Daswani and Does
Case Number: 2:2009cv00805
Filed: February 2, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County: XX US, Outside California
Presiding Judge: Anderson
Presiding Judge: Lum
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 56 FINAL JUDGMENT OF DAMAGES AGAINST DEFENDANT DILIP DASWANI by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: Final judgment is hereby entered against Defendant S&D Cellular Inc, d/b/a SND Cellular Inc and in favor of the Plaintiffs AT& T Mobility LLC and AT&T Intellectual Property II L.P. on all claims set forth in AT&Ts Complaint in the principal amount of FIVE MILLION DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ($5,000,000.00 (U.S.)), which shall bear interest at the legal rate, for which let execution issue forthwith. (am)
September 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 53 FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS by Judge Stephen G. Larson: (see document image for details). 7. Final judgment is hereby entered against Defendant S&D Cellular Inc, d/b/a SND Cellular Inc and in favor of the Plaintiffs AT& T Mobility LLC and AT&T Intellectual Property II L.P. on all claims set forth in AT&Ts Complaint in the principal amount of FIVE MILLION DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ($5,000,000.00 (U.S.)), which shall bear interest at the legal rate, for which let ex ecution issue forthwith. 8. S&D Cellular Inc d/b/a SND Cellular Inc and Dilip Daswani, and each and all of their past and present respective officers, directors, successors, assigns, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, related companies, etc. any type that is in any way affiliated or associated with any Defendant or any Defendants representatives, agents, assigns, parent entities, employees, independent contractors, associates, servants, affiliated entities, and any and allpersons and entities in active concert and participation with any Defendant whoreceive notice of this Order, shall be and hereby are PERMANENTLY ENJOINED (see document image for specifics). 12. The Court retains jurisdiction over this matter and the parties to this action in order to enforce any violation of the terms of this Permanent Injunction by a finding of contempt and an order for payment of compensatory damages to AT&T in an amount of $5,000 for each AT&T GoPhone or item of Activation Material that Defend ants are found to have purchased sold or unlocked in violation of this Injunction. The Court finds that these amounts are compensatory and will serve to compensate AT&T for its losses in the event Defendants violate the terms of this Order. 13. The Court hereby finds, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), that there isno just reason for delay and orders that Judgment shall be entered againstDefendants as set forth herein. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ad)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AT & T Mobility LLC et al v. S & D Cellular, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S & D Cellular, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dilip Daswani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AT & t Intellectual Property II, L.P.
Represented By: David B Esau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AT & T Mobility LLC
Represented By: David B Esau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?