Textron Financial Corporation v. Spanish Springs II, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Textron Finanacial Corporation
Defendant: Spanish Springs II, LLC, John E. King and Carole King
Counter Claimant: Spanish Springs II, LLC, John E. King and Carole King
Counter Defendant: Textron Finanacial Corporation
Case Number: 2:2009cv01205
Filed: February 19, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County: XX US, Outside California
Presiding Judge: Walter
Presiding Judge: Walsh
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 182 ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS ORDERED that Assignee Judgment Creditors Motion for an order charging the payment of the sum of $1,151,413.90 against Defendants/Judgment Debtors John E. King's and/or Carole Kings interests is GRANTED. (iv)
January 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 152 RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT BY CLERK. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Judgment against the DEBTORS be renewed as follows: Total judgment: $4,286,125.34 plus interest from December 1, 2009 through date of entry of judgment (i.e. Janu ary 19, 2010) at the rate of $925.06 per day for a total additional amount of $45,327.94, as modified to include an award of attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $321,620.94 by order of April 5, 2010. Costs after Judgment: $0.00. Interest after Judgment computed from 1/19/2010 through 12/16/19 at.35% per annum: $40,107.69. Less credits after judgment: $3,550,000.00. Total renewed judgment of $1,143,181.43. Related to: First EX PARTE APPLICATION for Renewal of Judgment re Judgment 111 127 Application for Renewal of Judgment 151 (yl)
April 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 127 ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTSby Judge John F. Walter. Good cause appearing, pursuant to the parties Stipulation 126 and based on the Court's order of 2/12/2010, the Court hereby orders, adjudges and decrees that Textron Financial Cor poration is awarded $321,620.94 pursuant to its motion for an award of attorneys fees and related costs, consisting of fees in the amount of $302,453.58 and costs of $19,167.36, in full and final resolution of the motion made by TFC for fees and costs up to and including the entry of judgment herein. (jp)
October 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 63 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh re Stipulation for Protective Order 62 . For good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED. (rp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Textron Financial Corporation v. Spanish Springs II, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Textron Finanacial Corporation
Represented By: Steven B Sacks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spanish Springs II, LLC
Represented By: Nathan T Lowery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John E. King
Represented By: Nathan T Lowery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carole King
Represented By: Nathan T Lowery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Spanish Springs II, LLC
Represented By: Nathan T Lowery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: John E. King
Represented By: Nathan T Lowery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Carole King
Represented By: Nathan T Lowery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Textron Finanacial Corporation
Represented By: Steven B Sacks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?