In Re Sed Lotfi
GRP Financial Services Corp. |
Sed Lofti |
Sed Lotfi |
2:2009cv01337 |
February 25, 2009 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
Los Angeles |
Selna |
Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER of Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge James V. Selna. Case Terminated. The Court having, on March 11, 2010, granted the Appellants Request for extension of Time to File Transcripts to May 21, 2010 and no transcripts having been filed as of todays date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). Made JS-6. (db) |
Filing 16 (In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge James V. Selna, RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: The Court ORDERS appellant(s)to show cause in writing no later than February 10, 2010 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. C ounsel is advised that the Court will consider the filing of the following documents in Bankruptcy Court with a status report to the District Court as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause, on or before the above date, to avoid dismissal: Reporter's transcript has not been filed. If this case has been settled and/or dismissed in the Bankruptcy Court you must file a separate dismissal in the District Court. (rla) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.