Arnoldo San Jose et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
Estate of Byron San Jose, Maria San Jose and Arnoldo San Jose |
City of Los Angeles, William Bratton, Derek Mousseau and Does |
2:2009cv01823 |
March 17, 2009 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
Los Angeles |
Kenton |
Matz |
P.I.: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 106 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: Plaintiffs have not made the specific and substantial showing required by FRCP 59(a) for a new trial. The Court therefore DENIES Plaintiffs Motion for New Trial 103 . No hearing is required. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. (jp) |
Filing 99 JUDGMENT by Judge A. Howard Matz, in favor of City of Los Angeles, Derek Mousseau, William Bratton against Arnoldo San Jose, Maria San Jose. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (kbr) |
Filing 76 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: Both Plaintiffs and Defendants have submitted briefing on Officer Derek Mousseaus status as a defendant in this proceeding. Because these filings constitute appearances and a waiver of service, and because equitable considerations weigh heavily towards finding Mousseau a defendant, I find that Mousseau is a party to these proceedings who is subject to trial. (se) |
Filing 25 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton. (rp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.