Range Road Music, Inc. et al v. East Coast Foods, Inc. et al
| Range Road Music, Inc., Sony/ATV Harmony, Williamson Music Company, Daniel Kuramoto, Kimo Cornwell, Teri Koide and Universal Music Corporation |
| East Coast Foods, Inc. and Herbert Hudson |
| East Coast Foods, Inc. and Herbert Hudson |
| Daniel Kuramoto, Kimo Cornwell, Range Road Music, Inc., Teri Koide, Universal Music Corporation, Sony/ATV Harmony and Williamson Music Company |
| 2:2009cv02059 |
| March 25, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| XX US, Outside California |
| Lum |
| Snyder |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants Range Road Music Inc., Sony/ATV Harmony, Williamson Music Company, Daniel Kuramoto d/b/a Little Tiger Music, Kimo Cornwell d/b/a Omik Music, Teri Koide d/b/a Skhamalee Music and Universal Music Corporation shall have the following judgment against Defendants/Counter-Claimants East Coast Foods, Inc. and Herbert Hudson, jointly and severally: Defendants and their respective agents, servants, employees and any other persons in active participation and concert with them are enjoined and restrained permanently from publicly performing, and from causing or permitting to be publicly performed, without prior authorization, at Defenda nts' premises, copyrighted musical compositions, etc. Defendants shall pay to Plaintiffs on their eight counts of copyright infringement the sum of $4,500.00 in statutory damages per count, for a total of $36,000.00 damages in the aggr egate. Defendants shall pay to Plaintiffs their costs incurred herein, including reasonable attorneys' fees, the amount of which is to be determined by way of motion filed with this Court. The Court further orders that the Defendants' counterclaim against Plaintiffs is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
