Securities and Exchange Commission v. Finbar Securities Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Robert Tringham and Finbar Securities Corp.
Receiver: Robb Evans & Associates LLC
Case Number: 2:2009cv02325
Filed: April 3, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County: Los Angeles
Presiding Judge: Kenton
Presiding Judge: Wright
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 93 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott, In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order Affirming Decision of Commissioner filed concurrently herewith, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED and this case DISMISSED with prejudice. 92 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
June 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 59 FINAL JUDGMENT OF MONETARY RELIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT FINBAR SECURITIES CORP.by Judge Otis D Wright, II: Defendant Finbar is liable for disgorgement of $9,492,744.95, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $2,853,986.55, for a total judgment of $12,346,731.50, to be paid within ten days of the filing of the Receivers final accounting in this action. Finbar shall disgorge all of the funds and assets of Finbars receivership estate(s), less Court-approved fees and expenses of the Receiver. After conclusion of the final distribution by the Receiver, any remaining disgorgement amounts shall be paid to the Securities and Exchange Commission, Operations Center.The Commission shall remit the funds paid pursuant to this paragraph to the United States Treasury. As to Finbar, and no other party, liability under this judgment shall be deemed satisfied in full upon the completion of the aforesaid final distribution and the filing with this Court of a final accounting by the Receiver, and any remaining unsatisfied portion of the judgment shall be waived.Related to: Settlement Agreement 57 (lc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Finbar Securities Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Tringham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Finbar Securities Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Represented By: David S Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Receiver: Robb Evans & Associates LLC
Represented By: Gary O Caris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?