Edwin Ibarra v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
| Edwin Ibarra |
| Does, PRLAP, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and NDEX West, LLC |
| 2:2009cv02757 |
| April 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Otero |
| Woehrle |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge A. Howard Matz. (kbr)
|
|
Filing
45
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: The declaration of Carlo O. Reyes, Esq. in response to the Court's Order to Show Cause fails to show cause for his failure to appear at the scheduling conference. Moreover, Mr. Reyes failed to file an amended complaint within the time deadline imposed by the Court (although the Court allowed the belated filing to be filed anyway, to avoid harming the plaintiff because of his lawyer's negligence). Accordingly, Mr. Reyes is ORDERED pay sanctions in the amount of $100.00 to the Clerk of the Court by not later than December 21, 2009. (mg)
|
|
Filing
41
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: Counsel for Plaintiff, Carlo O. Reyes, failed to appear at the joint scheduling conference, held on Monday, 12/7/2009. The Court ORDERS Mr. Reyes to show cause in writing by not later than 12/14/2009 why he should not be sanctioned in the amount of $100.00 for his failure to appear at today's scheduling conference. (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
