Richard E. Lee v. Los Angeles Unified School District et al
| Richard E. Lee |
| Los Angeles Unified School District, Nancy Ramirez, Lawrence Manion and DOES |
| 2:2009cv03067 |
| May 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Johnson |
| Matz |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
146
JUDGMENT by Judge A. Howard Matz, in favor of Los Angeles Unified School District, Lawrence Manion, Nancy Ramirez against Richard E. Lee. Defendants shall be entitled to recover their costs of suit in a sum to be determined by a motion for such costs. (kbr)
|
|
Filing
143
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz. The Court's Scheduling and Case Management Order states that a plaintiff's noncompliance with the pre-trial filing requirements will result in a dismissal for failure to prosecute. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff Richard Lee to show cause in writing, by no later than March 16, 2012, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (kbr)
|
|
Filing
94
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court has reviewed the parties submissions in response to the Court 10/22/2010 Order and rules as follows. (See attached Minute Order for further information). (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
