Deshay D. Ford v. Tri-Counties Regional Centers
| Deshay D. Ford |
| Tri-Counties Regional Centers |
| 2:2009cv03340 |
| May 12, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Ventura |
| Matz |
| Wistrich |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge A. Howard Matz, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 59 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (kbr)
|
|
Filing
57
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz. The Court has received a request from Plaintiff in letter form dated April 20, 2010,asking the Court to continue the scheduling order. The request is DENIED. (kbr)
|
|
Filing
40
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court DENIES Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Case and/or Strike Plaintiff's Amended Complaint under FRCP Sections 10(b) and 41(b) 31 . (See attached Minute Order for further information). (jp)
|
|
Filing
27
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court GRANTS Defendant Motion for a More Definite Statement under FRCP 12(e) 7 . For the foregoing reasons, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file an amended complaint with a more definite statement of his claims by 10/5/2009. Plaintiff amended complaint must state clearly and concisely what claims Plaintiff is bringing against Defendant and what factual allegations Plaintiff bases these claims upon. Plaintiff must otherwise comply with Rules 8 and 10 of the FRCP, including stating each factual allegation in a separate numbered paragraph and separating each cause of action into its own labeled heading. Plaintiff amended complaint must omit any references to Defendant actions against other individuals that are not directly relevant to Plaintiff own claims. If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint complying with this order by 10/5/2009, his Complaint will be stricken. No hearing is necessary. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L. R. 7-15. (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Deshay D. Ford v. Tri-Counties Regional Centers | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Deshay D. Ford | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tri-Counties Regional Centers | |
| Represented By: | Elaine M Vukadinovich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
