Rafael Guzman v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
| Rafael Guzman |
| Super Star Lending Group, Inc., Chris Molloy Mortgage, Inc., Christopher Molloy, Juan Carlos Sacristan, OneWest Bank, FSB, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Residential Mortgage Capital, Inc., Juan Rivas and DOES |
| 2:2009cv03970 |
| June 3, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Cooper |
| Wistrich |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen: The Court, on its own motion, ORDERS that counsel for plaintiff show cause in writing on or before July 1, 2010, why this action should not be dismissed as to the remaining defendant for lack of prosecution.The Court will consider the filing of the following, on or before the above date, as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause:-proof of service of summons and complaint on remaining named defendant: Juan Carlos Sacristan. (ama)
|
|
Filing
38
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen: re Proof of Service filed, 37 . The Court, on its own motion, ORDERS that counsel for plaintiff show cause in writing on or before, April 8, 2010, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.The Court will consider the filing of the following, on or before the above date, as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause: response by defendant(s) to complaint or plaintiffs request for entry of default. (ama)
|
|
Filing
36
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen: The Court, on its own motion, ORDERS that counsel for plaintiff show cause in writing on or before, April 6, 2010, why this action should n ot be dismissed for lack of prosecution.The Court will consider the filing of the following, on or before the above date, as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause: Proof of service of summons and complaint on ALL REMAINING DEFENDANTS. (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
