Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ahmad Haris Tajyar et al
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Vispi B. Shroff, Ahmad Haris Tajyar, Zachary W. R. Bryant, Omar Ahmad Tajyar and Dionysus Capital, LP
Case Number: 2:2009cv03988
Filed: June 4, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County: Los Angeles
Presiding Judge: Otero
Presiding Judge: Walsh
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 110 FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT OMAR AHMAD TAJYAR by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant and Defendant's agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation wi th them who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined. FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Commissions claims for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and a civil penalty are dismissed. FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Judgment Related to: Stipulation for Order 108 . (jp)
August 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 102 FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant and Defendant's agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined. FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED thatDefendant and Defendant's agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or parti cipation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined. FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that theConsent Of Defendant Zachary W.R. Bryant To Judgment of Permanent InjunctionAnd Other Relief, signed by the Defendant. Related to: Stipulation 101 . (jp)
April 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 93 JUDGMENT OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF AS TO DEFENDANT OMAR AHMAD TAJYAR filed by Judge John F. Walter: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant and Defendant agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in act ive concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently RESTRAINED and ENJOINED. (See attached Judgment for further information). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Judgment. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the FRCP, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Judgment forthwith and without further notice. (jp)
April 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 90 JUDGMENT OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF AS TO DEFENDANT Zachary W. R. Bryant by Judge John F. Walter: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant and Defendant agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined. FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant shall pay disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, prejudgment interest thereon, and a civil penalty pursuant to Section 21A of the Exchange Act, 15 USC 78u-1. FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Judgment. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the FederalRules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Judgment forthwith and without further notice. (jp)
November 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 48 FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge S. James Otero, in favor of Securities and Exchange Commission against Vispi B. Shroff and his agents : Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $207,931.70, representing profits gainedand/or losse s avoided as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $27,958.93, for total disgorgement and prejudgment interest in the amount of $235,890.63, and a civil penalty in the amount of $207,931.70, to be paid within 10 business days to the Securties and Exhange Commission (see document for specifics). (lc)
July 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER to Show Cause Re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution held before Judge S. James Otero. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing by not later than 7/20/2009 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (csi)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ahmad Haris Tajyar et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vispi B. Shroff
Represented By: James L Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ahmad Haris Tajyar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zachary W. R. Bryant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Omar Ahmad Tajyar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dionysus Capital, LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Represented By: William S Fiske
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?