Tangiers Investors, L.P. v. Mega Media Group, Inc. et al
| Tangiers Investors, L.P. |
| Mega Media Group, Inc., Alex Shvarts and Does |
| 2:2009cv04287 |
| June 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Eick |
| Lew |
| Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER Extending Time to Respond to Order to Show Cause by Hon. Ronald S.W. Lew: Having considered Plaintiffs request for an extension of time to comply with this Courts Order to Show Cause Why This Case Should Not be Dismissed for Lack of Prosecution, and good cause having been shown therefor, it is hereby ordered that the Plaintiff have to and including October 5, 2009, to complete its response to the order to show cause. ( Response to Order to Show Cause due by 10/5/2009.) (jre)
|
|
Filing
15
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: It is the responsibility of plaintiff to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action diligently, includin g filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than 9/25/2009, why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept PLAINTIFFS FILING OF A MOTI ON FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT ALEX SHVARTS; AND STATUS REPORT AS TO DEFENDANT MEGA MEDIA GROUP, INC., if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. Court Reporter: None. (gk)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than 8/14/2009, why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff, the Court will accept Defendant's answer to complaint or Plaintiff's Motion for default judgment against defendant as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently. (kpa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
