Ruben Odell Boulware v. California Department of Insurance Commissioner et al
| Ruben Odell Boulware |
| Unknown Agents John and Jane Does, California Department of Insurance Commissioner, Steve Poizner, Harry Low, John Garamendi, Shawn Ferris, Ruby Favis, Willie Lawrence, Kimberly Staal, Barbra Bridgewater and Daniel McKerren |
| 2:2009cv04325 |
| June 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| San Luis Obispo |
| alBRUnassigned |
| Eick |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Pursuant to the Order of the Court Adopting the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge, It is Adjudged that the Second Amended Complaint and the action are dismissed without leave to amend and with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sp)
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Judge Manuel L. Real. The RICO claims in the First Amended Complaint are dismissed without leave to amend. The malicious prosecution claim in the First Amended Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend as against Defendants Favis, Ferris, Staal, Lawrence, Bridgewater and McKerren. The First Amended Complaint otherwise is dismissed with leave to amend. If Plaintiff still wishes to pursue this action, he is grant ed 30 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order within which to file a Second Amended Complaint. The Second Amended Complaint shall be complete in itself. It shall not refer in any manner to any prior complaint. Failure to file timely a Second Amended Complaint may result in the dismissal of this action. (sp)
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Judge Manuel L. Real. The Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. If Plaintiff still wishes to pursue this action, he is granted 20 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order within which to file a First Amended Complaint. The First Amended Complaint shall be complete in itself. It shall not refer in any manner to any prior complaint. Failure to file timely a First Amended Complaint may result in the dismissal of this action. (sp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
