David Abrams v. Pioneer Properties, LLC et al
| David Abrams |
| M. N. Morales, Inc., Matthew Morales, Pioneer Properties, LLC, Lee Wetzel and M. N. Morales Service & Repair Co. |
| Roes 1-10 and David Abrams |
| Pioneer Properties, LLC |
| 2:2009cv04512 |
| June 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| XX US, Outside California |
| Morrow |
| Segal |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF by Judge Margaret M. Morrow, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiffs recover from defendants M.N. Morales Service & Repair Co., M.N. Morales, Inc., and Matthew Morales total damages of $54,814.72 for breach of contract, including $3,646.72 in attorneys' fees. This sum shall bear post-judgment interest at the rate of.27 percent. (bp)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Margaret M. Morrow, re Notice of Settlement 49 . THE COURT having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without costs and w ithout prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 45 days, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (rrey)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
