Express, LLC v. Forever 21, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Express, LLC
Defendant: Forever 21, Inc., Forever 21 Logistics, LLC, Forever 21 Retail, Inc.,, Jin Sook Chang, Do Won Chang and Does
Case Number: 2:2009cv04514
Filed: June 23, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County: XX US, Outside California
Presiding Judge: Kenton
Presiding Judge: Wright
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 168 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, and Granting Defendants' [90, 93, 97] by Judge Otis D Wright II. For the foregoing reasons, White Owls motion for summary judgment 90 is GRANTED, Forever 21 and Steps motion for summary judgment 93 is GRANTED, and Expresss motion for summary judgment 97 is DENIED. Defendants shall lodge a proposed judgment forthwith. (See Order for Details). (sch)
January 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton. ***NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT*** (ag)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Express, LLC v. Forever 21, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Forever 21, Inc.
Represented By: Robert F Gookin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Forever 21 Logistics, LLC
Represented By: Robert F Gookin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Forever 21 Retail, Inc.,
Represented By: Robert F Gookin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jin Sook Chang
Represented By: Robert F Gookin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Do Won Chang
Represented By: Robert F Gookin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Express, LLC
Represented By: Frank J Colucci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?