Elizabeth Rabb v. BNC Mortgage, Inc. et al
| Elizabeth Rabb |
| BNC Mortgage, Inc., Chase Home Finance, LLC, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and John and Jane Does |
| 2:2009cv04740 |
| June 30, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Matz |
| Zarefsky |
| Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court appreciates the parties' progress in reaching a loan modification agreement and thanks counsel. The Court is intent on closing this case by not later than March 15, 2013. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the paperwork for the loan modification be completed and made final by February 19, 2013 and ORDERS the parties to file a notice of settlement and dismissal without prejudice by not later than February 26, 2013. (smo)
|
|
Filing
64
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court has received the Declaration of Lashon Harris 63 in response to the Court's August 7, 2012 order 62 . The Court commends counsel for Defendants for their patience and persistence. The Court will not at this time dismiss this case for lack of prosecution. Defendants are ordered to file a further status report by not later than 10/1/2012. (jp)
|
|
Filing
48
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz. Defendant Chase Home Finance, LLC, is hereby ordered to notify the Court in writing, by not later than October 18, 2010, whether given recent announcements, it intends to proceed with the foreclosure transaction in this case. (kbr)
|
|
Filing
16
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court having recieved the Notice of Filing Bankruptcy by defendant BNC Mortgage LLC fka BNC Mortgage Inc., 15 the case is STAYED as to Defendant BNC Mortgage LLC, fka as BNC Mortgage, Inc., 11 USC se ction 362. The Court Orders the parties by 10/22/2009 to set forth their respective positions in separate filings not to exceed three pages as to whether the remainder of the case should be stayed pending the resolution of the Bankurptcy proceeding. No responses tothe other parties' filign shall be permitted. (jp)
|
|
Filing
13
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz re MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT 6 : The Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendants motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint. The Court GRANTS Defendants motion to dismiss as to claim two with leave to amend, but DENIES Defendants motion to dismiss as to claims one and three. Plaintiff shall file any amended complaint by October 5, 2009 (se)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
