James W. Brady et al v. Rip Curl, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: James W. Brady and Patricia M. Brady
Defendant: Efuego Corp., Club Swim, Inc., Beach Blvd. Swimwear & Clothing Co. and Rip Curl, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2009cv04925
Filed: July 9, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Kenton
Presiding Judge: Morrow
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER to Show Cause re Dismissal re Lack of Prosecution held before Judge Margaret M. Morrow. The court ORDERS plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before 11/16/2009 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. See order for details. (csi)
August 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 6 AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Margaret M. Morrow. The court has not received counsels Pro Hac Vice Application. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before September 2, 2009 why counsels appearance should not be stricken. The Order To Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiffs response. The court will consider the filing of the Pro Hace Vice Application and payment of fee as a satisfactory response to the Order To Show Cause. (rrey)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: James W. Brady et al v. Rip Curl, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Efuego Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Club Swim, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Beach Blvd. Swimwear & Clothing Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rip Curl, Inc.
Represented By: L Allan Songstad, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James W. Brady
Represented By: Anthony J Passante, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia M. Brady
Represented By: Anthony J Passante, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?