Amanda U. Ajuluchuku-Levy v. Bank of America et al
| Amanda U Ajuluchuku-Levy |
| Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and Bank of America |
| 2:2009cv05120 |
| July 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Snyder |
| Zarefsky |
| Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court finds Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to State a Claim (FRCP 12(B)(6); Request for Entry of Order Pursuant to Civ LR 83-8 12 appropriate for decision without ora l argument. Accordingly, the hearing date of 9/28/2009, is hereby vacated, and the matter is hereby taken under submission. Having filed approximately 28 complaints in the district, plaintiff Amanda U. Ajuluchuku-Levy was declared a vexatious litigan t in the Central District of California on 9/8/2009 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Accordingly, this Court issued an order stating that plaintiff may proceed against any defendant in this action on the filing of security in the amount of $5,000 by 9/29/2009. On 9/14/2009, plaintiff responded that she cannot post the required security. Accordingly, for good cause the Court dismisses plaintiff's complaint without prejudice. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
