Irma Fukumoto et al v. C.B. Fleet Company, Inc. et al
| Gary Wantz, Joseph M. Serochi, Shirley Moore and Irma Fukumoto |
| Does and C.B. Fleet Company, Inc. |
| 2:2009cv05342 |
| July 22, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Contra Costa |
| Woehrle |
| Walter |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Florence-Marie Cooper: re Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed 9 . The Court, on its own motion, ORDERS that counsel for plaintiff show cause in writing on or before September 2, 2009, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.The Court will consider the filing of the following, on or before the above date, as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause:-response by defendant(s) to complaint or plaintiffs request for entry of default.Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7.11, oral argument will not be heard in this matter unless so ordered by the Court. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of counsel's response. Failure to respond to the Court's order may result in the dismissal of the action. (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
