Henry Tiu v. Finance America, LLC et al
| Henry Tiu |
| ETS Services, LLC, GMAC Mortgage, Finance America, LLC and Does |
| 2:2009cv05902 |
| August 12, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Matz |
| Rosenberg |
| Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: In its 10/23/2009 Order, this Court dismissed Plaintiffs complaint, granting leave to amend by 11/2/2009. Plaintiff has filed no amended complaint. The Court, therefore, GRANTS Defendants' MOTION to Dismiss in its entirety 12 . The Court ORDERS the Clerk of the Court to close this case. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing
15
MMINUTE IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: On 1/21/2009, this Court Ordered counsel show cause, no later than 9/30/2009, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to pay the required filing fee. On 9/28/2009, plaintiff paid the fee. Accordingly, the Court DISCHARGES the Order to Show Cause 14 . (jp)
|
|
Filing
8
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz. The Court DENIES Plaintiffs Ex Parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order Preventing Foreclosure and Order to Show Cause Why Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue. (kbr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
