Screen Actors Guild, Inc. v. Detention, Ltd. et al
| Screen Actors Guild, Inc. |
| Anderson Film, Inc., Singa Home Entertainment and Detention, Ltd. |
| 2:2009cv06028 |
| August 18, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Rosenberg |
| Wu |
| Other |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
JUDGMENT CONFIRMING ARBITRATION AWARD by Judge George H Wu, in favor of Screen Actors Guild,1. The arbitration awards in SAG Case No. 2004-0109, dated August 22, 2005, and July 21, 2007, executed by Arbitrator Sara Adler are confirmed in allrespects. 2. PRODUCER [DETENTION, LTD. and ANDERSON FILM, INC.] is ordered to pay as follows: (a) To SAG on behalf of affected performers, the sum of $228,287.45 which represents the following: $117,407.28 as salary $15,615.17 in P&H $95,2 65.00 in LPLD; 3. PRODUCER [DETENTION, LTD. and ANDERSON FILM, INC.] andDISTRIBUTOR [SINGA HOME ENTERTAINMENT] are ordered to pay asfollows:(a) To SAG on behalf of affected performers, the sum of $89,000.00 as damages; (b) To SAG as and for SAGs attorneys fees incurred in this action, the sum of $1,800.00; and (c) To SAG as and for SAGs costs incurred in this action, the sum of $350.00. 7 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (pj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
