Peermusic, III, Ltd. et al v. LiveUniverse, Inc. et al
| WB Music Corp., Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp., Unichappel Music, Inc., Bug Music, Inc., Windswept Holdings LLC, Hitco Music Publishing, LLC, Southern Music Publishing Co., Inc., PSO Ltd., Songs of Peer, Ltd., Peer International Corp., Peermusic Ltd. and Peermusic, III, Ltd. |
| Brad Greenspan and LiveUniverse, Inc. |
| 2:2009cv06160 |
| August 24, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Abrams |
| Wu |
| Other |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
219
FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge George H Wu, 218 As a result, Defendants shall pay Plaintiffs statutory damages in the amount of $12,500 for each of the aforementioned 528 songs, or a total of$6,600,000. 3. Defendants shall also pay Plaintiffs attorneys fees incurred in thisaction, in the amount of $727,839.00 and costs in the sum of $28, 459.00. (pj)
|
|
Filing
203
MODIFIED ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS RE: PLAINTIFFS' RENEWED MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Judge George H Wu. IT IS ORDERED:1. The report and recommendation 197 is adopted. 2. Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion for Default Judgmen t Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(d) (Docket No. 182) is granted. 3. Defendants' Answer is hereby stricken from the record and the Clerk of the Court shall enter default against defendants. 4. The clerk shall serve this order on all counsel or parties of record. (ch)
|
|
Filing
202
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE: PLAINTIFFS RENEWED MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Judge George H Wu for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 197 , Renewed MOTION for Default Judgment 182 . ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: 1. T he report and recommendation is adopted. 2. Plaintiffs Renewed Motion for Default Judgment Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(d) (Docket No. 182) is granted. 3. Defendants Answer is hereby stricken from the record and the Clerk of the Court shall enter default judgment against defendants. 4. The clerk shall serve this order on all counsel or parties of record. (rp)
|
|
Filing
199
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. As of this date, the docket does not reflect the payment of the sanctions or the filing of a motion for review of the sanction order. Accordingly, attorney Bennett is ordered to show cause, NO LATER THAN JUNE 13, 2011, why additional monetary sanctions should not be imposed against him for failure to abide by the Court's May 17,2011, Order. Payment of the $1,000 sanction prior to June 13, 2011, shall be deemed compliance with this order to show cause. **See Order for details.** (ch)
|
|
Filing
165
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge George H Wu. IT IS ORDERED:1. The report and recommendation 161 is adopted. 2. Plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions (Docket No. 150 ) is GRANTED IN PART. 3. Defendants are precluded from relyin g on in this action, for any purpose whatsoever, any documents or information responsive to plaintiffs' discovery requests that defendants have not produced to plaintiffs as of January 26, 2011 (the date of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation). 4. Defendants' second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and tenth affirmative defenses as stated in the Amended Answer are stricken. 5. The clerk shall serve this order on all counsel or parties of record. (ch)
|
|
Filing
134
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY SANCTIONS by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams: Accordingly, NO LATER THAN 5:00pm on Tuesday, September 28, 2010, defendants are ordered to show cause, in writing, why additional sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to comply with their discovery obligations in this matter. **See Order for specific details.** Response to Order to Show Cause due by 9/28/2010. (sl)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Judge George H Wu that Plaintiffs be granted a preliminary injunction as follows: Defendants, and each of their officers, directors, agents, servants, employees and representatives, and those persons in active concert or participation with them or any of them, be preliminarily enjoined and restrained. Defendants shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order to implement any system necessary to facilitate compliance with this injunction. Defendants have not requested a bond pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(c), nor have they met their burden of establishing (1) that a bond is necessary or (2) the appropriate amount of such a bond if it were necessary. (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
