RE/MAX Mega Group v. Maxum Indemnity Company et al
Plaintiff: RE/MAX Mega Group
Defendant: Maxum Indemnity Company, S.H. Smith & Company, Inc. and Does
Case Number: 2:2009cv06310
Filed: August 28, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County: Los Angeles
Presiding Judge: Pregerson
Presiding Judge: Turchin
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 93 JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson, Pursuant to FRXP 56 judgment entered in favor of defendant Maxum Indemnity Company against plaintiff RE/MAX Mega Group (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)
December 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion To Reconsider 88 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Plaintiff does not allege a highly unusual circumstance, nor does it present the court with newly discovered evidence, clear error, or a change in controlling law. Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. (sch)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RE/MAX Mega Group v. Maxum Indemnity Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maxum Indemnity Company
Represented By: Robert Nicely Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S.H. Smith & Company, Inc.
Represented By: Larissa G Nefulda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RE/MAX Mega Group
Represented By: Mariyetta Alexis Meyers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?