Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Current Systems Technology, Inc.
The Contract Compliance Fund, The Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund and Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Labor Management Cooperation Committee |
Current Systems Technology, Inc. |
2:2009cv06433 |
September 3, 2009 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
Los Angeles |
Morrow |
Zarefsky |
Other |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFFS by Judge Margaret M. Morrow. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED That plaintiffs shall recover from defendant Current Systems Technology: (A) the principal sum of $443,688.41; (B) pre-judgment insterest of $26,007.20; and (C) attorneys' fees of $4,196.00 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp) |
Filing 20 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky, re: Stipulation for Protective Order, 19 . (mz) |
Filing 18 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky. Note: Changes have been made to this document. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) re Stipulation for Protective Order,, 17 (vm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.