Deckers Outdoor Corporation et al v. Dan Stelzer et al
| Deckers Outdoor Corporation and Nike, Inc. |
| Dan Stelzer, Ron Sagi, Vincent Lowery, Aaron Kay and Does |
| 2:2009cv06471 |
| September 4, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Santa Barbara |
| Matz |
| Mumm |
| Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz. On June 14, 2010, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why Defendant Ron Sagi should not be sanctioned in the amount of $100.00 for his failure to appear at the joint scheduling conference held that day. Mr. Sagi failed to file any response to the Court's Order. The Court thus ORDERS Mr. Sagi to pay $100.00 to the Clerk of Court, by not later than July 9, 2010. (kbr)
|
|
Filing
42
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: Defendant Ron Sagi failed to appear at the joint scheduling conference, held on 6/14/2010 in violation of the Court's Order Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference, dated 4/30/2010. Defendant also vi olated the Court's Order by failing to participate in the drafting of the Joint Report. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-7(a), Mr. Sagi is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing by not later than 6/24/2010 why he should not pay sanctions, in the amoun t of $100.00, for these violations. Mr.Sagi is further ordered to communicate with counsel for Plaintiff concerning the matters addressed in the Court's Case Management and Scheduling Order, issued today. Mr. Sagi is also hereby notified that his failure to respond could result in steps being taken to lead to a default judgment being entered against him. (jp)
|
|
Filing
28
CONSENT DECREE PURSUANT TO STIPULATION 25 by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court, having read and considered the Joint Stipulation for Permanent Injunction that has been executed by Plaintiffs and Defendant Aaron Kay, an individual and d/b/a AK Industr ies in this action: GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, THE COURT ORDERS that this Permanent Injunction shall be and is hereby entered in the within action as follows (see attached Consent Decree for further information). Defendant and his agents, servan ts, employees and all persons in active concert and participation with him who receive actual notice of the Injunction are hereby RESTRAINED and ENJOINED, pursuant to 15 USC section 1116. Except for the allegations contained herein, the claim alleged in the Complaint against Defendant Aaron Kay, an individual and d/b/a AK Industries only, by Plaintiffs is dismissed with prejudice. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over Defendant for the purpose of making further orders necessary or proper for the construction or modification of this consent decree and judgment; the enforcement hereof; the punishment of any violations hereof, and for the possible entry of a further Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation in this action. (jp)
|
|
Filing
26
PERMANENT INJUNCTION filed by Judge A. Howard Matz against Defendants. (kbr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
