Richard Whitehurst v. Walgreen's Company Store et al
| Richard Whitehurst |
| Ify Nwagboso, Samantha Briggs, Walgreen's Company Store, Walgreen's Compay Stores Pharmacy, Anchor Metro LLC and Does |
| 2:2009cv06680 |
| September 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Matz |
| Zarefsky |
| Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court is unable to find any other grounds on which Plaintiff purports to bring this motion. The Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 38 as utterly lacking merit. No hearing is necessary. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L. R. 7-15. (jp)
|
|
Filing
16
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court DENIES Defendants Motion to Dismiss 6 the original complaint without prejudice and invites Defendant to file a renewed motion addressing the First Amended Complaint directly. (jp)
|
|
Filing
13
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file a statement not to exceed three pages by 11/20/2009 including whether the claims remaining in the First Amended Complaint are worded identically to the corresponding claims in the original Complaint. The hearing calendared for 11/16/2009., 6 is taken off calendar. (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
