Mark Rossel v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Mark Rossel v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc

Mark Rossel v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc

Petitioner:	Mark Rossel
Respondent:	Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc
Case Number:	2:2009cv06902
Filed:	September 22, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Office:	Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County:	Los Angeles
Presiding Judge:	Abrams
Presiding Judge:	Otero
Nature of Suit:	Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 28, 2012	Filing 141 STIPULATED JUDGMENT by Judge George H Wu, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Award issued by FINRA, served on August 11, 2009, and issued in favor of Rosseland against Merrill Lynch and providing as follows:1. Respondent is liable f or and shall pay Claimantcompensatory damages of $252,916.91. Respondent is liable for and shall pay Claimant interest on $252,916.91 in the amount of 4.5% per annumcommencing thirty (30) days after service of the Awardand continuing until the Award is paid in full. Claimants request for expungement is denied.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (pj)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 28, 2012

Filing 141 STIPULATED JUDGMENT by Judge George H Wu, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Award issued by FINRA, served on August 11, 2009, and issued in favor of Rosseland against Merrill Lynch and providing as follows:1. Respondent is liable f or and shall pay Claimantcompensatory damages of $252,916.91. Respondent is liable for and shall pay Claimant interest on $252,916.91 in the amount of 4.5% per annumcommencing thirty (30) days after service of the Awardand continuing until the Award is paid in full. Claimants request for expungement is denied.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (pj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mark Rossel v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Mark Rossel
Represented By:	Danielle Claudat
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc
Represented By:	Vicky N Pham
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?