Walker Digital, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation et al
| Walker Digital, LLC |
| Mircrosoft Corporation, Dell Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Company |
| 2:2009cv07514 |
| October 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| XX US, Outside California |
| Pfaelzer |
| Turchin |
| Other |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
157
FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: (1) On its claims for relief, Plaintiff Walker Digital, LLC recover nothing, and the claims be dismissed on the merits; (2) On its Second Counterclaim, Defendant Microsoft Corporation be awarded a declarat ion that it has not infringed and is not infringing U.S. Patent No. 6,349,295; (3) On its Third Counterclaim, Defendant Microsoft Corporation be awarded a declaration that it has not willfully infringed and is not willfully infringing U.S. Patent No. 6,349,295; (4) On its Second Counterclaim, Defendant Dell Inc. be awarded a declaration that it has not infringed and is not infringing U.S. Patent No. 6,349,295; (5) On its Second Counterclaim, Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company be awarded a declara tion that it has not infringed and is not infringing U.S. Patent No. 6,349,295; (6) Defendants Microsoft Corporations, Dell Inc.s, and Hewlett-Packard Companys First Counterclaims for Invalidity are dismissed without prejudice to Defendants asserting such counterclaims in the event this matter is remanded for any reason, including for further consideration; and (7) Defendants Microsoft Corporation, Dell Inc., and Hewlett-Packard Company, as prevailing parties, recover costs from Plaintiff in the amount of (Left Blank) The Clerk is directed to enter this Judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ir)
|
|
Filing
138
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER Construing the Disputed Patent Claims and Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on No Literal Infringement by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez granting 43 Motion; granting 44 Motion for Summary Judgment; grant ing 46 Motion; granting 47 Motion; granting 49 Motion for Summary Judgment: The Court construes the disputed claims as discussed above and GRANTS Defendants' no literal infringement Motion for Summary Judgment (see document for further details). (bm)
|
|
Filing
38
FIRST STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (ca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
