Unihan Corporation v. Max Group Corporation

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Unihan Corporation v. Max Group Corporation

Unihan Corporation v. Max Group Corporation

Case Number:	2:2009cv07921
Filed:	October 29, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Chapman
Presiding Judge:	Morrow
Nature of Suit:	Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 28, 2011	Filing 132 JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF by Judge Margaret M. Morrow: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED 1. That plaintiff Unihan Corp. recover the sum of $2,080,754 on its breach of contractclaim from defendant Max Group Corp.; 2. That counterclaimant Max Group Corp. ta ke nothing by way of its first counterclaim for breach of Purchase Order No. 142108 ; 3. That counterclaimant Max Group Corp. recover the sum of $3,500 on its second counterclaim for breach of Purchase Order No. 142034A; 4. Offsetting Max Group Corp.s recovery on its second counterclaim against Unihan Corp.s recovery on its breach of contract claim, Unihan Corp. is entitled torecover the sum of $2,077,254 from Max Group Corp.; and 5. That the action be, and it hereby is, dismissed. Related to: Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law, 131 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rrey)
November 17, 2010	Filing 57 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman re Notice of Lodging 56 ; See order for details. (jy)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 28, 2011

Filing 132 JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF by Judge Margaret M. Morrow: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED 1. That plaintiff Unihan Corp. recover the sum of $2,080,754 on its breach of contractclaim from defendant Max Group Corp.; 2. That counterclaimant Max Group Corp. ta ke nothing by way of its first counterclaim for breach of Purchase Order No. 142108 ; 3. That counterclaimant Max Group Corp. recover the sum of $3,500 on its second counterclaim for breach of Purchase Order No. 142034A; 4. Offsetting Max Group Corp.s recovery on its second counterclaim against Unihan Corp.s recovery on its breach of contract claim, Unihan Corp. is entitled torecover the sum of $2,077,254 from Max Group Corp.; and 5. That the action be, and it hereby is, dismissed. Related to: Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law, 131 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rrey)

November 17, 2010

Filing 57 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman re Notice of Lodging 56 ; See order for details. (jy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Unihan Corporation v. Max Group Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?