Amanda Sateriale et al v. R J Reynolds Tobacco Co et al
Case Number: 2:2009cv08394
Filed: November 16, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Segal
Presiding Judge: Snyder
Nature of Suit: Other
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 234 FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: It is hereby ADJUDGED and DECREED that: Pursuant to the settlement reached by the parties, this Court hereby dismisses this action on the merits and with prejudice. See document for further details. (gk)
July 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 192 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Defendant R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company's Motion to Reopen Discovery 180 is GRANTED. Specifically, the Court finds good cause to reopen discovery as follows: (1) Depositions of RJR's New Fact Witnesses: Plaintiffs may depose the witnesses disclosed by RJR in its supplemental Rule 26 disclosures. These depositions shall be limited to topics relevant to contract interpretation under California law. (2) Depositions of Three Named Plain tiffs: RJR may re-depose the named, California plaintiffs for no longer than two hours per plaintiff. RJR shall pose non-duplicative questions on topics relevant to contract interpretation under California law. (3) Expert Testimony: RJR may seek to a dduce expert evidence both as to the harm suffered by plaintiffs as a result of the alleged breach, and as to the interpretation of data obtained from RJR's proposed survey of Camel consumers. Plaintiffs may depose each expert and procure rebuttal experts. Discovery into the limited issues discussed above is hereby REOPENED until 9/15/2015. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
June 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 186 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge Christina A. Snyder: DENYING 161 DEFENDANTS MOTION TO CERTIFY FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL THE COURTS ORDERDENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (shb)
February 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 74 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal re Stipulation for Protective Order, 71 ; Note Changes Made By The Court. See Order and Amended Stipulated Protective Order for details. (Attachments: # 1 Amended Stipulated Protective Order) (jy)
January 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 58 JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that for the reasons stated in the Court's 12/7/2010 Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (gk)
December 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court GRANTS Defendant R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company's Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint ("TAC") 50 . Given that this is plaintiffs' fourth complaint and allegations of other facts cannot "possibly cure the deficiencies" identified in the TAC, the Court dismisses this action with prejudice. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (gk)
May 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court finds Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint Pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 12(B)(1) and 12(B)(6) 24 appropriate for decision without oral argument. The hearing date of 5 /10/2010 is hereby vacated and the matter is hereby taken under submission. The Court GRANTS defendant's motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint with leave to amend. Plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint curing the defects noted herein within 30 days after the filing of this order. Plaintiffs are admonished that in the event that they do not amend their complaint within 30 days, the Court will dismiss this action with prejudice. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Amanda Sateriale et al v. R J Reynolds Tobacco Co et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?