Coach Services, Inc. v. Chunma USA, Inc. et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Coach Services, Inc. v. Chunma USA, Inc. et al

Coach Services, Inc. v. Chunma USA, Inc. et al

Case Number:	2:2009cv08583
Filed:	November 20, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Anderson
Presiding Judge:	Mumm
Nature of Suit:	Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 22, 2010	Filing 64 ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT INCLUDING A PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANTS PJEE CORPORATION AND DONG KIM by Judge Percy Anderson: Upon Stipulation 62 , it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendants PJEE Corporation and Dong Kim and their agents, servants, employees and all persons in active concert and participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from infringing upon the Coach Marks and CC Design, etc. Except as otherwise provided herein, this action is fully resolved with prejudice as to Defendants PJEE Corporation and Dong Kim. See document for details. (gk)
February 18, 2010	Filing 57 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Percy Anderson: Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 20 days after service. In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before 3/4/2010, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to defendants Dong Kim and Pjee Corporation. The court finds that this matter is appropriate for submissi on without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint against Dong Kim and Pjee Corporation. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 22, 2010

Filing 64 ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT INCLUDING A PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANTS PJEE CORPORATION AND DONG KIM by Judge Percy Anderson: Upon Stipulation 62 , it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendants PJEE Corporation and Dong Kim and their agents, servants, employees and all persons in active concert and participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from infringing upon the Coach Marks and CC Design, etc. Except as otherwise provided herein, this action is fully resolved with prejudice as to Defendants PJEE Corporation and Dong Kim. See document for details. (gk)

February 18, 2010

Filing 57 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Percy Anderson: Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 20 days after service. In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before 3/4/2010, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to defendants Dong Kim and Pjee Corporation. The court finds that this matter is appropriate for submissi on without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint against Dong Kim and Pjee Corporation. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coach Services, Inc. v. Chunma USA, Inc. et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?