Xcentric Ventures, LLC v. Elizabeth Arden Featured Case
Case Number: 2:2009mc00373
Filed: December 29, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: ArdenBRUnassigned
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2009 Filing 1 CERTIFICATION OF JUDGMENT FOR REGISTRATION IN ANOTHER DISTRICT received from USDC District of Arizona, case number CV 08-2299-PHX-HRH entered in the sending district on 10/22/09. JUDGMENT, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment be entered in favor of the plaintiff Xcentric Ventures, LLC and against the defendant Elizabeth Arden, d/b/a/ ComplaintsBoard.com, as follows: A. For statutory damages in the principal amount of $60,000.00; B. For interest on the statutory damages at the federal legal rate of 2.08% per annum from the date of this judgment until paid in full; C. For plaintiff's taxable costs in the principal amount of $396.59; D. For plaintiff's attorney fees in the principal amount of $3,145.00; and E. For interest on plaintiff's taxable costs and atttorney fees at the federal legal rate of 2.08% per annum from the date of this judgment until paid in full. Entered in this district on 1/6/09., filed by plaintiff Xcentric Ventures, LLC. (MD JS-6 Case Terminated)(ghap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Xcentric Ventures, LLC v. Elizabeth Arden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?