Jonas Ray Qualls, Jr. v. United States of America
Jonas Ray Qualls, Jr. |
United States of America |
2:2010cv00536 |
January 26, 2010 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John F. Walter |
Carla Woehrle |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter, in favor of United States of America against Jonas Ray Qualls, Jr. IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, without prejudice for lack of urisdiction. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jonas Ray Qualls, Jr. v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Jonas Ray Qualls, Jr. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: United States of America | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.