Gary King v. John E. Potter
Plaintiff: Gary King
Defendant: John E. Potter
Case Number: 2:2010cv00708
Filed: February 1, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): NOTICE OF DISMISSAL BY CLERK FOR LACK OFPROSECUTION by Judge George H Wu. On October 12, 2010, an Order to Show Cause for Lack of Prosecution 5 was issued for the following reason: Failure to diligently prosecute this action. Plaintiff was given until November 10, 2010, to respond and no response or objection has been filed. Plaintiff is hereby notified that this action is dismissed without prejudice.Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (ag)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gary King v. John E. Potter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John E. Potter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary King
Represented By: Robert C Moest
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?