Edgar Montenegro et al v. Ruggeri Marble and Granite, Inc. et al
Ruben Hernandez Gutierrez, Arturo Lara, Edgar Montenegro, Julio Montenegro and Francisco Morales Garcia |
Ruggeri Marble and Granite, Inc., Robert Ruggeri, Andre Ruggeri and DOES |
2:2010cv00711 |
February 1, 2010 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John F. Walter |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 94 JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter that Judgment shall be entered in favor of Plaintiffs Arturo Lara, Edgar Montenegro, Julio Montenegro, Ruben Hernandez Gutierrez and against Ruggeri Marble and Granite, Inc., Andre Ruggeri, Robert Ruggeri, jointly and severally, in the amount of $70,000.00, which will paid pursuant to the terms of the SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT attached as "Exhibit 1". The action is Dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to the terms of the Settlement agreement. This Judgment shall become final upon entry thereof as set forth int he Settlement Agreement, and Plaintiff and Defendants waive any right to appeal or seek review of this Judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp) |
Filing 84 ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 5 days, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated.Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (kbr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.