Chemex, LLC v. PT Kormac Pratama et al
| Chemex, LLC |
| Bancinsure, Inc., Does, First State Bank, PT Kormac Pratama and PT Media Lintas Benua |
| 2:2010cv00738 |
| February 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S. Fischer |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer, regarding Stipulation for Judgment 50 . Chemex, having properly interpleaded $838,870.20 with the Clerk of the Court, is hereby (a) discharged from this action; (b) discharged from all counterclaims that were or could have been pled in this action; (c) discharged and released from all liability in connection with any claims or disputes that have arisen or could have arisen in connection with the agreements referenced in or related to Chemexs Complaint in Interpleader filed in this action, which is attached as Exhibit 1 and hereby incorporated by reference as though set forth fully herein; and (d) discharged and released from all liability regarding the interpleaded funds, namely, the $838,870.20 deposited by Chemex, LLC with the Clerk of the Court. Chemex is entitled to and shall recover from the interpleaded stake on file with the Clerk of Court reasonable attorneys fees in the amount of $53,000, as well as $10,982.80, representi ng the portion of the pre-deposit interest on the interpleaded stake to which Chemex is entitled by Chemex. Such amounts shall be payable on presentation of this Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation to the Fiscal Department of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Each of the Parties is permanently enjoined from instituting any further litigation in any forum whatsoever regarding the interpleaded funds in this action, or with regards to the facts and agreements for ming the basis of Chemexs Complaint in Interpleader. No undertaking shall be required to be posted as security for thePermanent Injunction, and is specifically waived by the Parties. From theinterpleaded stake on file with the Clerk of the Court, Ba ncInsure shall recover the sum of $773,387.40 and First State Bank is entitled to recover the amount of $1,500.00. The Court shall retain jurisdiction even after entry of this Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation to enforce the Permanent Injunc tion and the Settlement Agreement executed by the Parties, and to adjudicate claims relating to its violation.Pursuant to the agreement of all of the Parties, in addition to all effects normally resulting from the entry this Judgment, this Judgment s hall have the same force and effect as to the Parties as a Judgment entered by an Indonesian Court of competent jurisdiction; The parties waive any rights to appeal this Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation, including but not limited to the Permanent Injunction. The Court specifically certifies that there is no just reason for delay of this Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation. (See document for further specific details) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ir)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
