J. H. v. Los Angeles Unified School District et al
| George Hesse, Jennifer Hesse and J. H. |
| Los Angeles Unified School District, Does 1 to 10 and Los Angeles Unified School District Special Education Local Planning Area |
| 2:2010cv00780 |
| February 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dean D Pregerson |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 20 U.S.C. § 1400 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson, re Stipulation dismisses action with prejudice #23 , (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
|
| Filing 23 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1) filed by Plaintiff J. H., George Hesse, Jennifer Hesse. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Favaloro, Mandy) |
|
Filing 22
ORDER GRANTING STAY PUT PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION: The Court ORDERS the District to continue providing J.H. with the following services:providing J.H.with the following services: 1. A PKIT one to five times per month, for a monthly total of 120 minutes; 2. OT services one to five times per month, for a monthly total of 120 minutes; and 3. OT clinic once per week for 60 minutes.In addition, the District shall continue to reimburse Parents forthe following services: 4. One-to-one LAS services from Milestones for three hours per week; 5. Daily BII services from STAR while J.H. attends theGarden School; and 6. BID services from STAR one to five times per month, for amonthly total of 180 minutes by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (lc)
|
| Filing 21 MINUTES OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING held before Judge Dean D. Pregerson:Court hears oral argument and takes the matter under submission.Court Reporter: Maria Bustillos. (lc) |
| Filing 20 MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Opposition filed by Defendants Los Angeles Unified School District, Los Angeles Unified School District Special Education Local Planning Area. To Order to Show Cause why preliminary injunction should not be granted. (Erwin, Donald) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson, that the Stipulation to Continue the Preliminary Injunction hearing #18 is GRANTED. The Preliminary Injunction Hearing shall be heard on 3/29/2010 at 10:00 AM. Any declaration, affidavits, points and authorities, or other submissions in support of, or in opposition to, the issuance of such an Order for Preliminary Injunction shall be filed with the Court and served on opposing party no later than 2:00 p.m. on March 26, 2010. It is further ordered that the Temporary Restraining Order shall stay in effect until Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction is heard. (ir)
|
| Filing 18 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Preliminary Injunction Hearing Date from 3/15/2010 to 3/29/2010, Joint STIPULATION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Defendants Los Angeles Unified School District, Los Angeles Unified School District Special Education Local Planning Area. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Erwin, Donald) |
| Filing 17 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge Dean D. Pregerson: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D Pregerson. Counsel are referred to the courts website for additional information. It is not necessary to clear motion date with court clerk prior to filing the motion. Court hears motions only on Mondays at 10:00 AM. The Court requires two non-blue backed courtesy copies of only the following manual and electronic filed documents: (1) All noticed motions and related documents; and (2) All ex parte applications and related documents (3) all exhibits and attachments must be separately tabbed. [Refer to the Court's General Order No. 08-02 regarding ECF Courtesy Paper Copies.] (lc) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF PRELIMINARY HEARING #15 :Hearing shall be heard before this Court on March 15, 2010 at 1100 a.m. Any declaration, affidavits, points and authorities, orother submissions in support of, or in opposition to, the issuance of such an Order for Preliminary Injunction shall be filed with the Court and served on opposing party no later than 2:00 p.m., on March 12, 2010. It is further ordered that the TRO shall stay in effect until Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction is heard by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (lc)
|
| Filing 15 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Preliminary Injunction Hearing Date from 03/08/2010 to 03/15/2010 filed by Defendants Los Angeles Unified School District, Los Angeles Unified School District Special Education Local Planning Area. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Continuance of Preliminary Hearing)(Erwin, Donald) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Los Angeles Unified School District, Los Angeles Unified School District Special Education Local Planning Area, identifying J.H., a minor; George Hesse and Jennifer Hesse; California Office of Administrative Hearings. (Erwin, Donald) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) #3 with Affirmative Defenses filed by Defendants Los Angeles Unified School District, Los Angeles Unified School District Special Education Local Planning Area.(Erwin, Donald) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting plaintiffs ex parte application for Temporary Restraining Order for Stay Put (see document for specifics as to ordered services) #7 ; It is further ordered that at 11:00 a.m. on March 8, 2010, or as soon thereafter as the parties can be heard, the defendants shall appear before this Court to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not be granted. Any declarations, affidavits, points and authorities, or other submissions in support of, or inopposition to, the issuance of such an Order shall be filed with the Court and served on the opposing party no later than 2:00 p.m., on March 5, 2010. by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (lc)
|
| Filing 11 REPLY In Support of EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to to enforce stay put during pendancy of litigation #7 and Supporting Declarations filed by Plaintiffs J. H., George Hesse, Jennifer Hesse. (Favaloro, Mandy) |
| Filing 10 Opposition re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to to enforce stay put during pendancy of litigation #7 filed by Defendants Los Angeles Unified School District, Los Angeles Unified School District Special Education Local Planning Area. (Erwin, Donald) |
| Filing 9 PROOF SERVICE filed by plaintiffs J. H., George Hesse, Jennifer Hesse, re Memorandum in Support of Motion, #8 , EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to to enforce stay put during pendency of litigation #7 , proposed order served on 2/17/10. (lc) |
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support of EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to to enforce stay put during pendancy of litigation #7 filed by Plaintiffs J. H., George Hesse, Jennifer Hesse. (Attachments: #1 Declaration N Jane Doubovy, #2 Declaration Mandy Favaloro, #3 Declaration Jennifer Hesse, #4 Exhibit 1, #5 Exhibit 2, #6 Exhibit 3, #7 Exhibit 4, #8 Exhibit 5, #9 Exhibit selected refs)(lc) |
| Filing 7 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to to enforce stay put during pendency of litigation filed by plaintiffs J. H., George Hesse, Jennifer Hesse. Lodged proposed order(lc) Modified on 2/19/2010 (lc). |
| Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Hesse, J. H., Jennifer Hesse, upon Defendant Los Angeles Unified School District Special Education Local Planning Area served on 2/10/2010, answer due 3/3/2010. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sharyn Howell, Executive Director of Special Education in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and no service by mail was executed. Original Summons NOT returned. (Favaloro, Mandy) |
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Hesse, J. H., Jennifer Hesse, upon Defendant Los Angeles Unified School District served on 2/10/2010, answer due 3/3/2010. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Noemi Fernandez, Administrative Assistant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (Favaloro, Mandy) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs J. H., George Hesse, Jennifer Hesse. (et) (ds). |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Defendants Los Angeles Unified School District, Los Angeles Unified School District Special Education Local Planning Area, Does 1-10. (Filing fee $ 350 PAID.), filed by Plaintiffs J. H., George Hesse, Jennifer Hesse.(et) (ds). |
|
Filing 2
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky: granting #1 Application to Appointment Guardian ad Litem is approved. Appointing George and Jennifer Hesse as Guardian ad Litem for J.H. George and Jennifer Hesse are authorized to file a Complaint for remedy under 20 USC 1400 on behalf of the minor J.H. (et)
|
| 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #3 as to Defendants Los Angeles Unified School District, Los Angeles Unified School District Special Education Local Planning Area, Does 1-10. (et) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Appointment of George Hesse and Jennifer Hesse as Guardian ad Litem for J.H. and Request for Order to Proceed on the Filing of the Complaint and Prayer for Relief Under 20 U.S.C. 1400, filed by plaintiffs J. H., George Hesse, Jennifer Hesse. Lodged Proposed Order. (Attachments: #1 Lodged Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ghap) |
| LODGED COMPLAINT forwarded to DUTY Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky. Complaint sought to be filed by Plaintiffs J. H., George Hesse, Jennifer Hesse. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
