IN RE TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
| Harry Stackhouse |
| Robert S Carter, Fujio Cho, Robert C Daly, Yoshimi Inaba, James E Lentz, III, Irving A Miller, Akio Toyoda, Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor North America Inc and Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc |
| Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Commonwealth of Massachusetts Pension Reserves Investment Management Board, William P. Condon, Global Institutional Investor Group, Harel Pia Mutual Fund, Institutional Investor Group, OMERS Administration Corporation, the administrator of the pension plans of the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System, Kathryn A. Squires and Judith W. Weinstein |
| 2:2010cv00922 |
| February 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S. Fischer |
| Securities/Commodities |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
323
FINAL JUDGMENT and Order of Dismissal with prejudice by Judge Dale S. Fischer: This Judgment incorporates by reference the definitions in the Stipulation, and all capitalized terms used, but not defined herein, shall have the same meanings as in the Stipulation. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Litigation and over all parties to the Litigation, including all members of the Class. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court hereby certifies th e Litigation as a class action for settlement purposes only. The Class consists of all Persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the American Depositary Shares of Toyota Motor Corporation during the period from May 10, 2005, through and including F ebruary 2, 2010, excluding Defendants and their Related Persons. Also excluded from the Class are any Persons who excluded themselves by submitting a request for exclusion in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Preliminary Approval Orde r, a list of whom is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. With respect to the Class, this Court finds, solely for the purposes of settlement. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, this Court hereby approves the Settlement set forth in the Stipulat ion and finds that the Settlement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable and adequate to Lead Plaintiff and the Class. The Court further finds that the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation is the result ofarm's-length negotiations between expe rienced counsel representing the interestsof the Settling Parties and is in the best interest of the Class. The Court further finds that the record is sufficiently developed and complete to have enabled Lead Plaintiff and Defendants to have adequatel y evaluated and considered their positions. Accordingly, the Settlement embodied in the Stipulation is hereby finally approved in all respects. The Settling Parties are hereby directed to perform its terms. (See document for further specific details) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ir)
|
|
Filing
227
ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL AND HIGHLYCONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich, re: Stipulation for Protective Order, 225 . (mz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
