Antonio Martinez v. J. Fletcher Creamer & Son, Inc et al
Antonio Martinez |
Does and J. Fletcher Creamer & Son, Inc |
2:2010cv00968 |
February 9, 2010 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Philip S. Gutierrez |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 80 ORDER GRANTING MOTION for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and Awarding Costs and Fees and Enhancement Payment 67 , 74 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez that the Court finds and determines that Plaintiff's Request for Costs and Fees in th e combined amount of $115,000 is reasonable, under both the percentage of the fund approach and based on a lodestar analysis, and awards Plaintiffs costs and fees in the amount of $115,000. The Court finds and determines that Plaintiff's request for an enhancement payment in the amount of $5,000 is reasonable and awards Plaintiff an enhancement payment in the amount of $5,000. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) |
Filing 39 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Certify Order for Interlocutory Review filed by Defendant J. Fletcher Creamer & Son, Inc. Motion set for hearing on 12/6/2010 at 01:30 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Renewed Motion for Certification of Order for Interloctury Review, # 2 Declaration of Sat Sang S. Khalsa in Support of Renewed Motion for Certification of Order for Interlocutory Review)(Khalsa, Sat) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.