Scottsdale Insurance Company v. The Milton H. Greene Archives, Inc. et al
| Scottsdale Insurance Company |
| Does, The Milton H. Greene Archives, Inc., The Soni Law Firm and VNU Business Media, Inc. |
| 2:2010cv01090 |
| February 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S. Fischer |
| Insurance |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
188
JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer: By order dated May 23, 2011, this Court issued its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law re the Priority of The Soni Law Firms Claim to the Disputed Funds Relative to Scottsdale Insurance Co.s and VNU Business Med ia, Inc.s Claims, concluding that the claims of both Scottsdale Insurance Co. and VNU Business Media, Inc. had priority over The Soni Law Firms claim. That decision is now on appeal. Scottsdale Insurance Co. and VNU Business Media, Inc. advised the C ourt that they had entered into a settlement agreement relating to the distribution of the disputed funds. On November 9, 2011, the Court issued its Findings of Fact Relating To Release of Interplead Funds, and on November 23, 2011, the funds were re leased. The Milton H. Greene Archives, Inc. has made a judicial admission that it does not assert a claim to any of the funds at issue in this action. (Docket No. 139 at 2:20-21.) Therefore, Scottsdale Insurance Co. is entitled to declaratoryjudgment that The Milton H. Greene Archives, Inc. has no claim to any of thefunds. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb)
|
|
Filing
187
FINDINGS OF FACT RELATING TO RELEASE OF INTERPLEAD FUNDS signed by Judge Dale S. Fischer. (vdr)
|
|
Filing
167
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE THE PRIORITY OF THE SONI LAWFIRMS CLAIM TO THE DISPUTED FUNDS RELATIVE TO SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE CO.SAND VNU BUSINESS MEDIA, INC.S CLAIMS signed by Judge Dale S. Fischer. (ir)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
