Maria Martinez v. City of Los Angeles et al
| Maria Martinez |
| DOES and City of Los Angeles |
| 2:2010cv01796 |
| March 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Manuel L. Real |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker: Response to Order to Show Cause due by 9/15/2010. (rla)
|
|
Filing
31
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER to Show Cause re Dismissal for Failure to Comply with Local Rules 83-2.8.1 and 83-2.8.3 held before Judge Josephine Staton Tucker. Plaintiffs counsel Victor Marin is hereby ordered to show cause no later than August 20, 2 010 as to why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice given his failure to complete an application for admission to the Bar of the Central District of California and pay the admission fee pursuant to Local Rules 83-2.8.1 and 83-2.8.3. The Court sets an Order to Show Cause hearing for August 30th at 1:30 p.m. If by August 20, 2010 Plaintiffs counsel files satisfactory proof of admission and a separate written response explaining why he has failed to comply with Local Rules 83-2.8.1 and 83-2.8.3, the Court will consider removing the matter from the calendar. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. (db)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
