Hy-Lok U.S.A., Inc. v. AVF Process Controls, Inc. et al
| Hy-Lok U.S.A., Inc. |
| Does and AVF Process Controls, Inc. |
| 2:2010cv02091 |
| March 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M. Gee |
| Contract: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR NON-COMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The deadline for completion of a settlement conference and a joint report re same were due on 11/16/2010 and 1 2/14/2010, respectively. To date, there is no indication in the record that the parties have complied with the Court's order. The Scheduling and Case Management Order required the parties to file by 12/14/2010 certain pretrial documents, some of them jointly, in anticipation of the final pretrial conference. On 12/22/2010, Plaintiff filed various pretrial documents. Defendant appears to be missing in action and has not participated in or approved those documents which were to be filed joint ly. At the final pretrial conference on 1/4/2011, the parties shall be prepared to explain why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with the Court's order as set forth above and to discuss whether this case is trial ready. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
|
Filing
14
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Margaret A. Nagle re Notice of Lodging 11 (ec)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
