Sean S Simonyan v. Countrywide Financial Corporation et al
| Sean S Simonyan |
| Countrywide Financial Corporation, Countrywide Bank FSB, Committee Appointed as Plan Administrator for the Countrywide Financial Corporation Change in Control Severance Plan, Bank of America NA, Bank of America and Does |
| Countrywide Financial Corporation Change in Control Severance Plan |
| 2:2010cv02455 |
| April 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Victor B. Kenton |
| A. Howard Matz |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton, This stipulated protective order is entered into by and between plaintiff Sean S. Simonyan (Plaintiff) and defendants Countrywide Bank FSB, Countrywide Financial Corporation, and Bank of America, N.A. (collective Defendants), by and through their respective counsel of record, to govern the production and disclosure of confidential documents and information in this action. re Proposed Protective Order 50 (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (lmh)
|
|
Filing
37
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz. Defendant Bank of America, is hereby ordered to notify the Court in writing, by not later than October 18, 2010, whether given recent announcements, it intends to proceed with the foreclosure transaction in this case. (kbr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
