Mike Steen v. City of Santa Monica

Mike Steen v. City of Santa Monica

Plaintiff:	Mike Steen
Defendant:	City of Santa Monica
Case Number:	2:2010cv02656
Filed:	April 12, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	David T Bristow
Presiding Judge:	Gary A. Feess
Nature of Suit:	Labor: E.R.I.S.A.

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 12, 2010	Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Gary A. Feess. Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecutio n on its own motion). In this matter: : Plaintiff(s) have failed to file a proof of service within 120 days of the filing of the Complaint. Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by showing that service was effectuated within the 120 day deadline or by showing good cause for the failure to do so. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Plaintiffs must respond to this order within 20 days. Failure to respond to this OSC will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 9/1/2010. (rfi)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 12, 2010

Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Gary A. Feess. Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecutio n on its own motion). In this matter: : Plaintiff(s) have failed to file a proof of service within 120 days of the filing of the Complaint. Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by showing that service was effectuated within the 120 day deadline or by showing good cause for the failure to do so. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Plaintiffs must respond to this order within 20 days. Failure to respond to this OSC will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 9/1/2010. (rfi)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mike Steen v. City of Santa Monica
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mike Steen
Represented By:	William D Becker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: City of Santa Monica
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?