Taylor Morrison Services Inc v. Zurich American Insurance Company et al
Taylor Morrison Services Inc |
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA, New Hampshire Insurance Company, The Continental Insurance Company, Does, Markel American Insurance Company, Chartis Insurance (UK) Limited, American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company, Ace European Group Limited, Ace Insurance SA-NV and Zurich American Insurance Company |
2:2010cv03334 |
May 4, 2010 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John E. McDermott |
Christina A. Snyder |
Insurance |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 ORDER by Judge Christina A. Snyder GRANTING Stay of the Case pending Approval in State court of Underlying Class Action Settlement 53 , that this action and all proceedings herein, including all dates under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and t he Local Rules, are stayed for 120 days from the date of this Order. Further ORDERED that the 8/16/2010 hearing on National Union and Chartis Specialty's motion to transfer, stay and/or dismiss and Markel's motion to dismiss are vacated. Th e Court places this action on its inactive caseload. A Joint Status Report shall be filed on or before 11/22/2010, and every quarter thereafter, unless reinstatement of the case on the Court's active caseload. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (jp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.