Nathan Karl Bohman v. Francisco J. Quintana

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Nathan Karl Bohman v. Francisco J. Quintana

Nathan Karl Bohman v. Francisco J. Quintana

Plaintiff:	Nathan Karl Bohman
Defendant:	Francisco J. Quintana
Case Number:	2:2010cv03352
Filed:	May 5, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Frederick F. Mumm
Presiding Judge:	Dean D. Pregerson
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 29, 2012	Filing 24 JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. IT IS ADJUDGED that the action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 23 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (vm)
June 29, 2010	Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm: On May 19, 2010, this Court entered an Order Dismissing the Petition with Leave to Amend. Plaintiff was granted thirty days leave to file an amended comp laint. Plaintiff's first amended complaint is two weeks overdue. Accordingly, the Court orders plaintiff to show cause in writing within 15 days of the date of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 7/14/2010. (jm)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 29, 2012

Filing 24 JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. IT IS ADJUDGED that the action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 23 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (vm)

June 29, 2010

Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm: On May 19, 2010, this Court entered an Order Dismissing the Petition with Leave to Amend. Plaintiff was granted thirty days leave to file an amended comp laint. Plaintiff's first amended complaint is two weeks overdue. Accordingly, the Court orders plaintiff to show cause in writing within 15 days of the date of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 7/14/2010. (jm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nathan Karl Bohman v. Francisco J. Quintana
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathan Karl Bohman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Francisco J. Quintana
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?