Primerica Life Insurance Company v.Kimberly Morley et al
| Primerica Life Insurance Company |
| Does, Kimberly Morley and Amber Workman |
| 2:2010cv03364 |
| May 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| A. Howard Matz |
| Insurance |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION by Judge A. Howard Matz, that The above captioned action, US District Court for the Central District of California Case No. CV10-3364-AHM (PLAx), be dismissed with prejudice. That the money deposited with the court by Plaintif f Primerica Life Insurance Company be distributed as follows: The sum of $95,000.00 (ninety-five thousand dollars) to be paid to Kimberly Morley and Gray Duffy LLP, her attorneys, in full settlement of all claims; The sum of $20,000.00 (twe nty thousand dollars) to be paid to Bette Workman-Hui and Dion-Kindem and Crockett, her attorneys, in full settlement of all claims; The balance of the remaining proceeds to be paid to Amber Lynn Workman and Dion-Kindem and Crockett, her attorneys, i n full settlement of all claims. No payment is to be made to Kevin Farmer; Each party bear its own mediation fees, court costs and attorney fees. Stipulation Re Settlement 48 is incorporated herein by this reference. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
