Billy D. Anderson v. High Desert State Prison
Petitioner: Billy D. Anderson
Respondent: High Desert State Prison
Case Number: 2:2010cv03462
Filed: May 10, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: George H. King
Presiding Judge: Ralph Zarefsky
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 JUDGMENT by Judge George H. King, Related to: R&R Adopting Report and Recommendations, 24 . IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and the action is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mz)
May 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky Response to Order to Show Cause due within 21 days. (ib)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Billy D. Anderson v. High Desert State Prison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Billy D. Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: High Desert State Prison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?